# item.guide

Monk Fruit Extract (Mogroside V)

Sugars & Alternative Sweeteners · 8 specs

Direct Answer

Monk fruit (luo han guo, Siraitia grosvenorii) extract derives its sweetness from mogrosides, a group of triterpene glycosides concentrated from the fruit's flesh. The dominant compound, Mogroside V, is roughly 250 times sweeter than sucrose, non-caloric, and has zero glycemic impact -- though most commercial "monk fruit sweetener" products blend it with erythritol or another bulking agent rather than selling pure mogroside extract.

Source: FDA GRAS Notices (Siraitia grosvenorii extracts, since 2011) / Wikipedia · Last reviewed Aug 28, 2026

Specs

Sweetening Compound Mogroside V (dominant of several mogrosides present)
Relative Sweetness Index ~250 (250x sucrose, for Mogroside V specifically)
Energy / Calories 0 (Non-caloric) kcal
Glycemic Index (GI) 0 (Zero insulin spike)
US Regulatory Status GRAS (FDA, since 2011)
EU Regulatory Status Not approved (Novel Food dossier still pending as of 2023 EFSA review)
Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) Not established by JECFA/EFSA (unlike stevia's formal ADI)
Typical Commercial Form Usually blended with erythritol or another bulking agent, not sold as pure mogroside extract

A US-Approved, EU-Unapproved Sweetener

Raw monk fruit flesh contains mogrosides at only around 1% by weight; commercial extracts concentrate this to as much as 80% mogrosides through solvent extraction. The FDA granted GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) status to Siraitia grosvenorii extracts in 2011, but the EU's food safety authority reached a different conclusion: as of its 2019/2023 novel-food review, EFSA found the submitted safety data insufficient, leaving monk fruit extract without EU market approval -- a genuine regulatory split worth knowing if sourcing or shipping the ingredient internationally, not just a formality.

Unlike stevia, which has a JECFA-established Acceptable Daily Intake, no formal ADI has been set for monk fruit extract, reflecting its more limited body of long-term safety literature relative to stevia's decades of study.

Something wrong or missing on this page?